英文摘要 |
The institution of personality rights is open to change. With socio-economic development in China, there are more and more types of personality rights. The theory of divine rights can justify the legitimacy of protection of personality rights to some extent, yet it cannot revolve specific issues about confirmation, development and protection of personality rights. To date, personality rights are not only negative rights but also increasingly positive rights. This is manifested in both the positive use of spiritual personality rights and necessary control of material personality rights.The co-existence of defensive and positive personality rights means that it is difficult to effectively protect and utilize personality rights by simply listing out types of personality rights and applying the remedial rules from torts law. Only through improving the legislation on personality rights and introducing an independent chapter on personality rights in China's civil code, can we respond to social needs sufficiently and establish a scientific and progressive institution of personality rights. |