《詩經．商頌．殷武》之「景山」地望說商榷

A Discussion on the Location of Jingshan in Shangsong Yinwu of the Book of Odes

《詩經．殷武》末章之「景山」一地，從漢至民國以來，討論未定。雖然毛《傳》釋為「大山」，但後多數學者將其地與《左傳．昭公四年》「景亳之命」相連，從而衍生出對亳地考訂的諸多問題。本文的寫作目的，首先在於檢討歷來對「景山」地望的說法。認為諸家在考訂「景山」地望上，所論不夠完備者，或涉有對古史的誤解，或於考訂古地名的方法上有商榷之處。其次，本文就諸家所論，逐一辨析，並認為毛《傳》「大山」說最為合理。 YinWu in 'The Book of Odes', the last chapter of' Jingshan 'a place, from the Han to the Republic since the discussion undecided. Although Mao 'Biography' interpreted as 'big mountain', but most scholars after it with 'ZuoZhuan. Zhao Gong for four years, '' King Bo's command 'is connected to Bo derived right to examine and correct many problems. Purposes of this article, the first is always right to review 'Jingshan' to look argument. That various home in Textual 'Jingshan' to look on those who are not complete on or involving a misunderstanding on ancient history, or in the methods of the ancient names Textual have questionable. Secondly, this article on the house of all, one by one discrimination, and that hair 'Biography' 'Big Mountain' says most reasonable.