以《西湖二集》與《西湖遊覽志餘》內容之重合——論蘇興「《西湖遊覽志餘》或為《西湖一集》」觀點之疑義

Finding the same content between《The second episode of West Lake》 and 《Notes on the West Lake》, to consider that Su Xing's thought–《Notes on the West Lake》may be《The first episode of West Lake》– may be wrong

之於《西湖二集》，已有不少學者對其內容來源進行爬梳。而當筆者讀到蘇興〈所謂《西湖一集》的問題〉一文中所提出的《西湖遊覽志餘》或為《西湖一集》之看法，私以為尚有討論的空間，故欲借重各家之研究成果，與筆者的比對做一統整，將《二集》與《志餘》於內容上的重合處一一指出，以求略述此論點的疑義之處。 It's already had lots of scholars try to find the source of stories in The second episode of West Lake, therefore, I had read Su Xing's ‘the question of The first episode of West Lake'.In this paper, Su Xing thought that Notes on the West Lake may be The first episode of West Lake,but I think that thought may not be right, so I try to use other scholars' studies, to find out the same content between The second episode of West Lake and Notes on the West Lake, to prove that Notes on the West Lake may not be The first episode of West Lake.