月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
建築與規劃學報 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
學童步行通學最佳環境安全路徑之研究──以台中市上石國小為例
並列篇名
A Study on the Evaluation of the Most Adaptable Schooling Pedestrian for Shang-Shih Elementary School
作者 謝政穎謝竺君
中文摘要
近年來相關研究逐漸重視學童通學的課題,學童因身體的脆弱性及注意力不易集中、道路設施認識不足、商家及攤販私自占用騎樓及人行道等因素導致學童交通安全事件頻繁,使得家長接送比例提高。但相關研究指出長期接送易影響學童人格發展與對周遭環境的學習,故本研究採用多準則決策評估模式(MCDM),並透過文獻回顧分析提出「學童步行通學最佳環境安全路徑評估指標」,以三項構面、十三點評估因子及三條通學方案,由環境規劃專家進行分析階層程序法(AHP)評比,求得評估指標相對權重與最佳通學路線,研究結果顯示指標構面以「人行空間(人行道與騎樓)」獲得最高權重為0.537,評估因子以「人行空間系統的連續性」為整層級排序第一,權重值為0.250,最佳評選方案以「方案一」的權重值最高為0.414,顯示學童通學環境應強調人行空間規劃與改善並以學童步行特性進行規劃,提供步行通學的安全環境設施。 In recent years, many research emphasized on pupils go to school. Children characteristics, road environment and private occupancy have caused many traffic accidents. So that the proportion of parents transport them to school has increased, but it will affect children behavior. The Multi-Criteria Decision Making model (MCDM) was used as the main method for this study. The empirical study selected three routes, three dimensions and thirteen evaluation factors and used Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to obtain the relative weight of evaluation indicators and the adaptable or suitable route. The results showed that the highest weight is the space of pedestrians (sidewalk and arcades) (0.537), continuity of pedestrian space systems (0.250) and alternative ONE (0.414). Thus, planners should consider the characteristics of the children and the surrounding pedestrian space and environment.
英文摘要
In recent years, many research emphasized on pupils go to school. Children characteristics, road environment and private occupancy have caused many traffic accidents. So that the proportion of parents transport them to school has increased, but it will affect children behavior. The Multi-Criteria Decision Making model (MCDM) was used as the main method for this study. The empirical study selected three routes, three dimensions and thirteen evaluation factors and used Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to obtain the relative weight of evaluation indicators and the adaptable or suitable route. The results showed that the highest weight is the space of pedestrians (sidewalk and arcades) (0.537), continuity of pedestrian space systems (0.250) and alternative ONE (0.414). Thus, planners should consider the characteristics of the children and the surrounding pedestrian space and environment.
起訖頁 43-59
關鍵詞 多準則決策評估模式學童步行通學分析階層程序法最佳環境安全路徑評估指標與方案選擇Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)Pedestrian PlanningAnalytical Hierarchy Process(AHP)The Adaptable Environmental Safety PathEvaluation Indicators and Alternatives
刊名 建築與規劃學報  
期數 201406 (15:1期)
出版單位 中華大學建築與都市計畫學系
該期刊-上一篇 應用情境相依資料包絡分析法(Context-Dependent DEA)評估縣市文創產業發展
該期刊-下一篇 台灣老人居住安排與生活滿意度關係之區域差異分析
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄