法教義學能為立法貢獻什麼？

What Can Legal Dogmatics Do for the Legislation?

將法教義學定位為“現行實在法科學”並不意味著它與立法沒有關聯。反對“法教義學能為立法作出貢獻”的主張可以被歸納為四個命題，它們都源於對於法教義學本身的錯誤理解。法教義學既具有穩定化和整合功能，也具有革新功能。在此基礎上，法教義學能為立法作出貢獻的理論基礎在於承認法的雙重因素和追求立法的科學化。一方面，法教義學可以影響立法的內容，其影響途徑又分為三種，即直接為立法提供支援、間接為立法提供支持，以及對立法進行批判。另一方面，法教義學也可以影響立法的體系，這種結構性影響更加穩定和持久。因此，在規範性的意義上，離開法教義學的立法是不可能的。這並不意味著要取消立法的形成空間，而只是意味著要對立法者的權力進行理性限制。

The position of legal dogmatics as 'science of valid positive law' does not mean that it has nothing to do with legislation. The views opposing 'the possible contribution of legal dogmatics to legislation' can be summarized as four theses, which are all rooted in false understanding about legal dogmatics as such. Legal dogmatics has not only functions of stabilization and integration, but also innovative function. On this basis, the theoretical foundation of the reason why legal dogmatics can contribute to legislation lies in the double elements of law and the pursuit of scientific legislation. On the one hand, legal dogmatics can shape the contents of legislation with three influential ways, i.e., providing direct, indirect and critical support to legislation. On the other hand, legal dogmatics can also impact on the systematic style of legislation. This structural molding is comparatively more stable and durable. Thus, in the normative sense, legislation without legal dogmatics is unimaginable. But this does not suggest abolishing the margin of legislation accordingly, but only means that the power of legislature should be restrained rationally.