融通一貫之經學／敬學──鮮儒崔象龍《論語辨疑》研究

Comprehending Jing (classics) and Jing (Caution): A study of Chosun scholar Choi Sang Ryong’s Lunyu Bianyi

本文將崔象龍《論語辨疑》置於十八世紀中葉以還，嶺南退溪學派邁入經注研究興盛期的四書注釋發展脈絡中，而來研究考察崔象龍抱持著何種《論語》觀？《論語辨疑》之解經立場與解經法有何關聯？又崔象龍之《論語》認識使其聚焦於何種核心義理思想？並藉由探究此等問題，梳理出崔象龍《論語辨疑》承繼、接續、融通和貫串了嶺南退溪學內部諸宗派之為學立場，同時亦涵容了百數十年前近畿南人之經書觀、《論語》觀，試圖描繪出嶺南退溪學內部經典詮解、注釋的歷時發展脈絡與樣相。本文之撰作目的，乃是為了解明崔象龍《論語辨疑》凸顯了何種嶺南退溪學派經注特色與經學研究的轉向，並為其作一定位。而據本文研究，崔象龍此種融通一貫之經學／敬學，乃是融通退溪門下鶴峰金誠一與寒岡鄭逑二脈，同時旁涉西崖柳成龍一脈，亦即上承李象靖，兼採愚伏鄭經世、權榘之為學法，同時揉合眉叟許穆所辯證改訂後之退溪學，進而互參畿湖學派李栗谷、金沙溪與韓元震之學說的總合表現，堪稱是承繼受容十八世紀以降嶺南退溪學派四書學研究之一貫脈絡的經學研究成果。

This paper studies Choi Sang ryong’s Lunyu Bianyi (“A Discussion andAnalysis of” if “Questions and Analyses on The Analects of Confucius” is notcommonly used by scholars. The Analects of Confucius) under the circumstanceswhile Yeongnam Toegyechak school was in Its flourishng period of exegesis and“made annotations of,” if the footnotes provides additional information or areused for interpreting the text. Four Books after the mid-18th century (if it occursfrom the mid-18th century, not from the late 18th century). How did Choi SangRyong view Lunyu (The Analects of Confucius)? What was the relation betweenhis perspective and the methodology of his exegesis? And what core idea didChoi Sang Ryong develop based on his understanding of Lunyu? I will analyzethe position (or perspective) of Choi Sang Ryong’s Lunyu Bianyi – continuing,inheriting, and comprehending different factions in Yeongnam Toegyechakschool, also containing Geungi namin’s view on classics and Lunyu. I will alsodepict the diachronic development and modality of interpreting and makingexplanatory footnotes on classics in Yeongnam Toegyechak school. This paperwill describe how the exegesis features and research on Confucian Classics ofYeongnam Toegyechak school were presented in Choi Sang Ryong’s LunyuBianyi. It will locate Choi Sang Ryong’s studies in the tradition of exegesis study.According to the research, Choi Sang Ryong’s comprehensive understanding onJingxue (Confucian Classics) and Jingxue (learning on caution) were acombination of Hakbong Kim Seong Il and Hangang Jeong Gu’s theory inYeongnam Toegyechak school. Choi also used in Seoae Lyu Seong Ryong’stheory, which inherited from Yi Sangjeong, along with Jeong Woobok JeongGyeong Se and Byeonggok Gwon Gu’s way of pursuing learning. Meanwhile,Choi blended his ideas with Misu Heo Mok’s modification on Toegyechak.Further, Choi refered to the studies conducted by Kikogaku school’s Yulgok Yi I,Sagye Kim Jang saeng and Namdang Han Wonjin. Choi’s Lunyu Bianyi could beregarded as an outcome inheriting Yeongnam Toegyechakʼs consistent researchcontext on the Four Books after 18th century.