惠棟《古文尚書考》辨偽舉證的效力平

The effectiveness of the evidence of falsification on Hui Tung’s “Gu Wen Shang Shu Kao”

關於歷來學者考辨《古文尚書》辨偽舉證的證據效力，不只梅鷟讓人難以充分信從，就算是後來學者如閻若璩、惠棟，也僅是取得相對於梅鷟更加周延的考辨策略，然而諸多根本性的爭議還是存在。本命題即就惠棟《古文尚書考‧卷下》，關於1.「獨出惠棟」。2.「惠棟、梅鷟」。3.「惠棟、閻若璩」，等等三組辨偽舉證類型，嘗試分析《古文尚書》的考辨傳承至惠棟，所謂的「辨偽舉證」，是否有出現更加確鑿的證據效力。

As for the effectiveness of the evidences of falsification by the scholars, not only Mei Zhou's findings can not be accepted, but the following scholars like Hui Tung and Yan Ruo Qu only concentrated on more detail strategies of Mei Zhou's falsification. However, many fundamental arguments exist. The aim of this article is to examine the three kinds of falsification in Hui Tung's ”Qu Wen Sang Shu Kao, volume 2” to find if there are the evidences of falsification when Hui Tung's analyzing ”Gu Wen Sang Su”. These three kinds of falsification are 1. Hui Tung; 2. Hui Tung and Mei Zhou; 3. Hui Tung and Yan Ruo Qu.