英文摘要 |
The statement of injured party might be the main even the one and only evidence in a trail of sexual assault case due to the difficulty of evidence collection afterward. According to the report of sexual assault survey made by Ministry of Justice in 2009, the proportion of the victims aged from 14 under 16 years old accounted most for 24.6% , the age from 6 under 14 years old was 18.2%, from 16 under 18 years old was 13%. Based on the statistics made by the Sexual Assault Prevention Committee, Ministry of Interior, indicated that the injured children and youth reached the high proportion of 69%. Therefore, to protect the right and benefit of the injured minors is worth particularly highlighting. How to evaluate the testimonial evidence of the minors’ statement during the process of the accused case’s investigation and trial after it occurred and was delivered to the criminal justice system. How to judge the proof value of corroborative evidence to avoid sacrificing the “goal of truth discovery in criminal justice” as well as the collateral damage to the injured minors while highlighting the defendant’s human right. This research analyzed the literature and court verdicts, including comparative court practice in Japan and the United States to inquired how to form the inner conviction through reasonable evaluation on the testimonial evidence of the statement during the process of investigation and trial from the victims, social workers in company , the report of expert, forensic science, lie detection test, etc. |