如何將證據轉換為事實：以崔英杰為例

HOW TO TRANSFORM EVIDENCE INTO FACT? TAKING THE CUI YINGJIE CASE AS AN EXANPLE

證據以及證據規則在事實認定上起著至關重要的作用。證據是認識案件事實的第一來源，如果證據發生變化，最終的事實文本必然發生重大變化。由於傳統的關於案件事實的討論只關注證據而忽視敘事建構，如果用傳統法學理論觀察案件事實，我們會感受到證據與事實文本之間存在某種斷裂地帶，可是這種斷裂又不為人所承認，這樣的矛盾將導致在證據與事實間的認識、推理問題上，得出一些模糊混亂的理解。筆者因此嘗試在這個階段提出一個推進式的理論框架來弭補這種認識上的斷裂感。

The main concern of this paper is to analyze the lateral differences among factual narrative texts to the same case, as wall as the narrative mechanism that causes the lateral differences. This paper applies four principles of the story model, namely, (1) coverage (2) coherence (3) uniqueness and (4) goodness-of-fit to the study of the evidence of the Cui Yingjie Case. The author explores the reason why different applications and interpretations that adopted by both the prosecutor and defense attorney in the trail of the case could not provide a reliable logic to illustrate the necessity of their statement. By applying these principles of the story model, this paper reasonably explains the mechanism behind the techniques that both prosecution and defense adopted in the trail of the case.