英文摘要 |
The main concern of this paper is to analyze the lateral differences among factual narrative texts to the same case, as wall as the narrative mechanism that causes the lateral differences. This paper applies four principles of the story model, namely, (1) coverage (2) coherence (3) uniqueness and (4) goodness-of-fit to the study of the evidence of the Cui Yingjie Case. The author explores the reason why different applications and interpretations that adopted by both the prosecutor and defense attorney in the trail of the case could not provide a reliable logic to illustrate the necessity of their statement. By applying these principles of the story model, this paper reasonably explains the mechanism behind the techniques that both prosecution and defense adopted in the trail of the case. |