英文摘要 |
The copula verb red is widely distributed in the Central, Northeastern, and Southeastern sections of Tibetic languages, forming obvious opposition with another copula verb yin to convey evidential and epistemic meanings of heterophoric and egophoric respectively. In Old Tibetan red only acted as a content verb defined as become or turn. No later than the 14th century, in the region of Muya, which affiliated to the Southeastern section of Tibetic Languages, red evolved into both a copula verb and an auxiliary verb, which indicated tense and aspect. Correspondingly, an adversarial relationship of pragmatic-epistemic meaning between the structure formed by the copula yin and declarative sentence-final particle –o in Old Tibetan exists, in which yin is utilized frequently in the Negative Structure. Therefore, acquired mood distinctions exist to convey subjective judgment and emphasis, and also constitute distinction of the structure of –o formation, which is generally adopted to convey indicative mood that indicates less of the speaker or writer’s subjective attitude. Subsequently, in colloquial speech no later than the 14th century, with the extinction of the particle –o, red gradually took the place of the particle –o and developed much more stringent correspondence between the egophoric and heterophoric meaning. |