英文摘要 |
International efforts strive to mitigate the rate of climate changecaused by man-made greenhouse gas emissions. Attributing aneconomical value to forest carbon sequestration might represent animportant strategy to achieve such goals. Such a policy is likely to impactoptimal rotation periods in forestry management. However, accounting forcarbon sequestration alone is not sufficient; the lower surface albedo offorests, compared to converted land, causes a higher grade of heatabsorption, which negatively affects the policy value of forests. Yet due tophotosynthesis, not all of the absorbed energy is converted to heat, butpartially used as chemical energy.Thus, this paper discusses the optimum rotation periods and landexpectation values of Cunninghamia lanceolata under the impact ofcarbon sequestration and the mentioned radiation budget. The findingssuggest that in the presence carbon sequestration pricing, the optimalrotation periods and land expectation values ought to increaseproportionally to carbon prices. The optimal rotation periods of threedifferent scenarios is compared: “just a timber (T),” “timber and carbonbenefits (Tcs),” and “timber、carbon and carbon equivalent of radiationbudget (Ttecs )”. The relation between them is: Tcs is greater than or equalto Ttecs; Ttecs is greater than or equal to T. |