論刑法規範的司法邏輯結構－－以四維論取代二元論的嘗試

On the Judicial Logic Structure of Criminal Norms An Attempt to Substitute the Dualism with the Four- dimensional Theory

司法邏輯觀念是一種立體思維，它在刑法學思維中架構起刑事法庭，而二元論對此無能為力。在刑法規範觀上面，基於司法邏輯的四維論力圖超越二元論，為此提倡原則－－規則－－標準的綜合性規範觀念。建基於二元論和唯規則論的刑法學十分漠視法庭旁聽者，對行為規範的性質和內容及其個體主義呈現方式都缺乏認識。在司法邏輯下，應區分追訴規範與辯護規範，並在這種框架下理解法益與規範、構成要件與定罪情節。以行為規範為背景、以上述區分為前提的裁判規範，具有中立性和裁量性。刑法學視域中的法官不應被視為無個性的“自動售貨機”。

Being a kind o£ stereoscopic thinking, the Judicial Logic concept constructs a structure of criminal court; in contrast the Dualism cannot do anything. According to the Judicial Logic, the criminal norms concept takes on a four-dimensional structure. In order to overcome the Dualism, we should advocate a comprehensive norms concept comprising principles-rules-standards. Based on the Dualism and Doctrine of Rules Only, the traditional criminal law completely ignores the bystanders in the court, as well as the nature and content of conduct norms. Moreover, there is little cognition about its individualism presentation mode in the traditional criminal law. In terms of the Judicial Logic, it is necessary to distinguish the prosecution norms and defense norms. Only in this frame can the legal interest and norms, constitutive requirements and conviction plots be understood. Against a background of conduct norms and above-mentioned distinction, the adjudication norms will possess a neutral feature and a discretional feature. In the process of studying criminal law, judges cannot be deemed as non-individual automatic vending machines.