英文摘要 |
Only articles which have absorption and cross relationship can establish concurrence of articles. Imaginative concurrence has nothing to do with the article relationship. It depends on occasional criminal facts activating the relationship between articles. Concurrence of articles' essence is the superposition between constitutive elements of crime, which is set to prohibit repetitive assessment. Imaginative concurrence's essence is the superposition between the violation of legal interests, and its set to avoid valuation omission and guarantee the inferior articles could work. Inferior articles in concurrence of articles could also work. Imaginative concurrence's so-called 'express function' is only the identification and declaration of the criminal facts, so we have only to find out all the facts of the cases, declare them in the verdict and adopt the method of heavier punishment. In this circumstances, it's meaningless to strictly distinguish concurrence of articles and imaginative concurrence. Provision 'if there is another provision, please conform to it' in the criminal law is only an indicative regulation. It should conform to the principle 'the punishment according to the heavier crime'. Many new articles like 'implementing other crimes at the same time' in Criminal Law Amendment (Ⅸ) illustrate that the legislators are tired of distinguishing 'lex specialis rule' and 'severe articles'priority' and they admit that no matter its concurrence of articles or imaginative concurrence, the crime should be punished by the heavier punishment. |