結果無價值論與二元論之爭的共識、誤區與發展方向

Consensus, misconception and development direction of controversy between Erfolgsunwert and Dualism

結果無價值論與二元論之爭對於推動中國刑法學走向深入化、系統化和個性化起到了巨大推動作用。經過相互論爭和彼此影響，兩派的對立色彩較之於論戰之初已大為減弱。雙方在諸如堅持法益保護的刑法目的觀、貫徹罪刑法定原則等基本立場方面，已經形成了廣泛共識。論爭過程中出現的一些理論誤區，例如不同功利主義流派、行為規範和裁判規範與不法論的對應關係、構成要件與犯罪類型的關係，以及主觀違法要素與正當防衛等，亟待澄清。未來，結果無價值論與二元論之爭，似乎應從宏觀的理念和立場層面，回歸到更為技術性、操作性的實際問題之上，特別是應當聚焦於古典犯罪論體系與綜合型犯罪論體系的比較分析。

The controversy between Erfolgsunwert and Dualism plays a significant role for promoting Chinese Criminal Jurisprudence to head for a direction of in-depth, systematization and individualization. Compared with controversy during the very beginning, the opposition of both sides has already been narrowed. Both sides have formed a broad consensus on fundamental standpoints, such as adhering to regard protection of legal interests as aim of Criminal Law, and implementing principle of legality. Theoretical misconception occurred during the process of argument, such as corresponding relation between different genres of utilitarianism and theory of illegal, relation between norms of behavioral and adjudication and theory of illegal, relation between Actus reus and Tatbestand, subjective elements of Rechtswidrigkeit and justifiable defense, are urgent to be clarified. In the future, the controversy between Erfolgsunwert and Dualism probably shall return to practical issues which are even more technical and operational in terms of macro conceptions and standpoints, especially shall focus on the comparative analysis of classic criminal theory system and comprehensive criminal theory system.