論證模式分析及其評量要素

A Critical Review of Argumentation　in Science Education

本文旨依據科學論證的流派，進行分析探討；首先針對論證理論進行回顧分析，發現論證探討主要從論證結構、科學概念以及認識論探討三個分析角度切入。其次針對論證的評量判準進行討論，發現觀察現象和理論選擇的融貫性的重要。最後則呼應真實科學的學習應特別強調論證和論證過程的動態呈現。

This article reviews the papers of argument a t ion in science education. At first, the result shows three dimensions mus t be pay a t tention whi le learning argumentat ion in science education. (a)argumentation framework, (b)scientific concept, and (c)epistemology. Second, from the respect of the quality of argument a t ion, the corherence and consistence between the facts and the theory are most important factors. Finally, the processes of argumentation are emplasized while learning science in making.