英文摘要 |
This research tries to find out if second language learners of Chinese have the same patterns of contrastive pitch as those of the native speakers to properly distinguish the various usage of the sentence-final particle NE. An acoustic analysis is implemented with a written test to subjects of native and nonnative speakers of Chinese to read out short dialogues containing sentences ended with final particle NE to find out if they pronounce NE with a high tone at the end of an interrogative and a low tone, a non-interrogative. Results show that subjects whose native language does not have the final particle system do not score high as Chinese natives do. However, there is no correlation between nonnative speakers’ test scores and their Mandarin proficiency even they have achieved intermediate level of pronunciation accuracy, Chinese character recognition and pragmatic realization. It is found that whether final NEs are obligatory do significantly correlate with nonnative speaker’s pitch correctness. When attached to an abbreviated question, NE is obligatory, but when it follows a question word question, alternative question or A not A question, it is optional. It is learners’ communication strategy that influences nonnative speakers to overlook the optional NEs and pronounce its tone as a free variation. As for the obligatory NE, learners tend to pronounce it correctly with the high tone to make their communication successful. It is therefore suggested that the causes of second language learners’ errors need to be carefully investigated. By highlighting the contrastive tone and paying more attention to learners causes of secondtrategies, teaching and acquisition of the final particles NE can be reinforced. |