英文摘要 |
Legal transplant is one of the common means of legal reform. Due to sharing Marxist-Leninist ideology with the former Soviet Union, the drafters of China’s constitution were highly influenced by the Soviet model both in the Constitutions of 1954 and 1982. Constitutional rights with Soviet features can easily be found in China’s Constitutions where the State holds a positive obligation to ensure the fulfillment of both liberal rights as well as social and economic rights, and defend state and collective interests from infringement by the demands of individual rights. Thus, rights in socialist legal order are not an effective instrument against state authorities, but are treated as an opportunity provided by Communist regimes with the purpose of enhancing social solidarity. UN human rights treaties founded on liberal ideologies have some limited but potential impact on shaping human rights legislation in China, despite the fact that domestic courts have no competence to apply UN human rights treaties. In my view, this implies to some extent that Chinese ruling elite would be favorable to promoting reform of human rights legislation in compliance with UN human rights standards on condition that any new human rights legislation offers no threat to the ruling status of China’s Communist Party as well as ensuring that social order would not be overthrew by new human rights legislation. On the other hand, the outcome of an ideological struggle and compromise between the reformers and Marxist Leftists is the crucial factor determining incorporation of UN universal standards into China’s new human rights legislation. |