論庭審筆錄的法定化

On the Legalization of the Trial Transcript

現行民事訴訟因缺失法定化的庭審筆錄制度作為監督、制約庭審的有效手段，導 致現實中庭審程序空洞化、虛無化現象的發生，也導致訴訟當事人、利害關係人常常為程序合法與否的事實判斷爭執不休。為了防止這種結果，保障和提升我國民事訴訟的公正性，維護程序的安定性，應建立法定化的庭審筆錄制度，使庭審筆錄真正成為能夠為當事人、訴訟參與人所閱覽、使用，並能作為證明庭審程序合法與否的法律文書；筆錄製作主體成為相對獨立於庭審法官的公證官，實現對司法權的內部制約。法定化的庭審筆錄也成為落實法官責任制，判斷審判程序是否合法的根據。在建立法定化筆錄制度的同時，還應當相應地進行司法人事體制 的改革，改革現有的書記員制度，建立書記官制度，通過法律制度保障書記官職能的行使。

The current Civil Procedure Law lacks the statutory system of the trial transcript, which can be used as an effective means to supervise and restrict the trial. This results in the court trial procedure becoming hollow and vain in reality, and causes the parties and interested parties to argue about fact judgment of procedure's legality. In order to prevent this outcome, guarantee the impartiality of the civil procedure and maintain the procedure's stability, the thesis advocates that, the statutory system of the trial transcript should be established, the trial transcript as a kind of legal instrument can be read and utilized to prove the court trial procedure's legality by the parties and litigant participants, and the subject making the transcript should become the notary relatively independent of the judge to realize the internal control of judicial power. The statutory trial transcript will be the grounds of implementing the judges' accountability system and deciding whether the judicial procedure is legal or not. The author also proposes the reform of the judicial personnel system and the existing court clerk system, calls for the establishment of the record officer system to safeguard the function of the record officer through the legal institutions.