論國際投資仲裁中拒絕司法救濟之新途徑

New Remedy Approaches to Denial of Justice in International Investment Arbitration

拒絕司法雖然是一個古老的國際法術語，但在國際投資法領域，其外延、適用前提以及救濟途徑都有了新的變化和發展。本文首先簡述拒絕司法在有關國際投資條約中的表現；繼而對國際投資仲裁實踐中拒絕司法的傳統救濟途徑進行論述；在此基礎上，指明隨著國際投資仲裁實踐的發展，拒絕司法救濟並已出現或可能會出現的新途徑，並結合實際案例分析這些新途徑的特徵，以及其與傳統意義上拒絕司法的區別與聯系；最後針對這些新的救濟途徑提出相應的對策分析。Although'Denial of Justice'is deemed as one of the oldest in-ternational law terms, it has made an apparent development in its denotation, its premise of application and its remedy approaches in the field of international in-vestment law. This article demonstrates Denial of Justice in the relevant interna-tional investment treaties, and then elaborates the normal remedy approach to Denial of Justice in the international investment practice. It also points out that Denial of Justice has been(or will be)remedied through some new approaches with the development of international investment arbitration. Combining with the case-by-case analysis, it investigates the distinctions of these new approaches, as well as the link with Denial of Justice. Thus, as a conclusion, it puts forward the corresponding countermeasure analysis on these new remedy approaches.