英文摘要 |
By lack of specification of the employer' unfair labor practices in the past, it makes difficult for the development of Union activity. The problem had been substantially resolved after updating three new labor laws which enacted the rules of employer' unfair labor practices. Taiwan's Labor Union Act divided the rules of employer' unfair labor practices into private rights and non-private rights disputes. It also enacts the way of remedies in the Act for Settlement of Labor-Management Disputes which makes unfair labor practices showing the double-track system. However, the controversy occurs with systems in theory and practice. Legally speaking, the purpose of unfair labor practices is to give relief to Union' solidarity and keep the relation between labors and employers remaining in a good way. It is not focusing on individual labor rights. Current ruling system in our country is to remedy individual labor rights (relating to private rights dispute) and the ruling of against the Union' solidarity (not involving private rights dispute) is following the same rule as the private rights dispute. In practice, it leads to distinguish disputes difficultly due to not making it clear that the incident involving the private dispute or non-private rights dispute. It is complicated in dispute whether the event should be governed by the district court or administrative court when the client is unsatisfied with the results of verdict. Therefore, it is hard to interpret this system in law. The way to put an end to disputes is to reform the system of unfair labor practices back to give relief to Union's solidarity. |