| 英文摘要 |
Thisthesisexploresthelegaldisputesarisingfrompricemisquotationsinonlinetransactioncontracts,focusingspecificallyonthelegalnatureofproductpricingpagesandtherescissionoferroneouspriceindications.Withtheproliferationofonlinetransactions,businessesfaceasignificantnumberofconsumerdisputestriggeredbypricingerrors.Thisstudyfirstexaminesthedefinition,types,andrelevantlegalregulationsofonlinetransactions,andanalyzestheformationofonlinetransactioncontractsandthelegalnatureofproductpricingpages.Thepaperarguesthatthelegalnatureofaproductpricingpageshouldbedeterminedbythetypeofbusinessinvolved,usingthecompletenessofthepage,thecompany’sabilitytoperform,andthepresenceofconsumerrelianceinterestsascriteriaforevaluation. Subsequently,thestudyinvestigatesthelegalpositioningofautomatedinformationsystems,theeffectivenessofwebsitetermsofuseemployedbybusinessestopreventconsumerdisputes,andthelegislativeefficacyofsub-lawsenactedbyauthoritiestoaddressthesedisputes.Itdelvesintothecontroversiesrelatedtotheformationofcontractsincasesofpricingerrors.Additionally,thepaperthoroughlyexaminesthelegaleffectsofpricingerrors,exploringwhetherbusinessescanrescinderroneousdeclarationsbasedoncivillawandtheinteractionwithconsumerprotectionlawregulations,whileincorporatingcomparativelegalanalysis. Ultimately,thethesisdrawsoninternationallegislativeexamplesandproposespreliminarysuggestionsforimprovingtherelevantlegalframeworkinTaiwan,advocatingforamendmentstoclarifythelegalnatureofproductpricinganderrorhandlingmechanismstoenhancelegalpredictabilityandeffectiveness. |