本文以「憲法法庭作為『整合法院』」為題，藉由整合的概念或內涵，詮釋憲法、憲法解釋及憲法法庭，而證成憲法法庭之整合任務、整合模式與整合功能，以確立憲法法庭作為整合法院。憲法法庭所為的整合，旨在對於憲法爭議中的歧異，先依照憲法訴訟法的相關程序，透過憲法對話進行多元價值的平衡、權力衝突的協調，再基於憲法所確立的「基本共識」（憲法規範），尋得憲法歧異中的「共識」（憲法解釋）。為此，本文首先論述我國憲法中具有整合之內涵，並依照憲法訴訟法之相關規定，說明憲法訴訟程序作為整合程序，致推論出憲法法庭依照憲法規範，具有整合任務；其次，探討憲法法庭對於攸關整合任務的釋憲案件，按照不同憲法訴訟類型，進行不同的違憲審查操作模式（整合模式）；從而，歸類整合性憲法解釋所生的整合功能，包括基本權利之相互影響及權力分立之動態平衡，以證成憲法法庭作為整合法院，致憲法法庭及其憲法解釋受到人民信賴。準此，本文依照憲法、憲法訴訟法及釋憲實務，說明憲法法庭之整合任務、整合模式及整合功能，即探討憲法法庭以整合為名進行憲法解釋的合法性、類型性及正當性，以證成憲法法庭作為整合法院。

This article, entitled The Constitutional Court as an“Integration Court”, explores the concept and meaning of integration in relation to the Constitution, the constitutional interpretations, and the Constitutional Court. This article examines the integration task, integration model, and integration function of the Constitutional Court, demonstrating its role as an integration court. The integration carried out by the Constitutional Court aims to resolve differences in constitutional disputes by balancing multiple values and coordinating power conflicts through constitutional dialogue in accordance with the relevant procedures of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act. Subsequently, the Constitutional Court, in accordance with the“basic consensus”(constitutional norm) established by the Constitution, seeks to find a“consensus”(constitutional interpretation) amid constitutional differences. First, this article discusses the meaning of integration in the Constitution and elucidates the constitutional court procedure as an integration procedure according to the relevant provisions of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act, arguing that the Constitutional Court undertakes integration tasks based on the constitutional norms. Second, this article explores how the Constitutional Court, according to different types of constitutional litigation, employs different operating models of judicial review (integration models) for constitutional cases concerning integration tasks. Therefore, this article classifies integration functions derived from the integrated constitutional interpretations, including the mutual influence of fundamental rights and the dynamic balance within separation of powers in order to justify the Constitutional Court as an integration court, thereby earning the trust of the people in its constitutional interpretations. To this end, this article, in accordance with the Constitution, the Constitutional Court Procedure Act, and the practice of constitutional interpretations, delineates the integration task, integration model, and integration function of the Constitutional Court. This article examines the legality, typology, and legitimacy of the Constitutional Court’s constitutional interpretation undertaken in the name of integration, ultimately demonstrating that the Constitutional Court serves as an integration court.