本研究針對近29年（1996 - 2024）臺灣專業期刊中親子遊戲治療論述型文章與研究型論文進行內容分析，共蒐集13篇論述型文章與24篇研究型論文，合計37篇。研究者以年度發表量、論述型文章與研究型論文發表量、刊登期刊、研究主題、研究對象、研究方法、研究工具、研究結果等八大項度進行探析。本研究結論（與建議）有七：一、Garry Landreth設計十週的親子遊戲治療模式為主要理論基礎。二、親子遊戲治療文獻量受該領域的學會、刊物與當代社會現象、政策法令影響。三、親子遊戲治療研究對象、議題具多元與豐富之探究廣度。四、親子遊戲治療適合質性、量化或質量整合研究，並探討介入、追蹤與類化效果。五、親子遊戲治療引進初期論述型文章為多，隨之研究型論文持續探究不同適用性。六、親子遊戲治療以男性為參與對象之研究與實踐待繼續倡議。七、發展在地化、本土化之華人親子遊戲治療模式。承上，期能供後續學術研究與實務工作者參考之。

This study conducted a content analysis of narrative articles and research papers on filial therapy published in Taiwanese professional journals over 29 years (1996–2024). Content analysis serves several functions: describing trends in the evolution of a research field, identifying important issues, highlighting neglected areas, clarifying research concepts and models, and understanding the contributions of the literature. The objectives of this study are as follows: First, to examine the changes and developments in the number of articles and research papers on filial therapy published in Taiwan from 1996 to 2024, as well as the number of journals in which they appeared. Second, to analyze the research topics, characteristics of research participants, research methods, and scales used by Taiwanese researchers in filial therapy from 1996 to 2024. Third, to provide an overview of research results on filial therapy in Taiwan during this period. Fourth, to provide references for researchers and practitioners, thereby promoting both the academic development and practical effectiveness of filial therapy in Taiwan. A total of 37 narrative articles and research papers were reviewed. Annual publications and discussions were examined. The analysis was conducted in nine categories: type and number of publications, journals of publication, research topics, research participants, research methods, research tools, and research results. The results and suggestions of this study are as follows: 1. The ten-week filial therapy model designed by Garry Landreth was the main theoretical foundation. 2. Literature on filial therapy is influenced by societies, publications, social phenomena, policies, and laws in the field. For example, the Association for Taiwan Play Therapy was established in December 2005 and began publishing the Journal of Taiwan Play Therapy in 2011. Research on filial therapy has increased overall; however, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of academic research studies declined due to government regulations such as social distancing. 3. Research participants and topics in filial therapy are diverse and wide-ranging. 4. Future research should focus on the suitability, quantification, and quality of filial therapy, as well as the effects of intervention, follow-up, and generalization. 5. In the initial developmental stage of filial therapy in Taiwan, most articles were discursive, while research papers experimented with issues of applicability. 6. Research and practice of filial therapy with men need to be continued. 7. Localized Chinese models of filial therapy should be developed. Notably, Taiwan’s filial therapy has integrated elements of Chinese dietary culture to construct localized practices—comparing the kitchen to the playroom and parent-child cooking to filial play. By drawing on the cultural significance of eating, another model of filial therapy has been explored, which is indeed worthy of recognition. Finally, this study found that if filial therapy is explored from cross-cultural, local, and systemic perspectives, or if different models of filial play therapy are integrated and developed, filial therapy can move toward a localized and indigenized model suitable for Taiwanese families. This article demonstrates that Taiwan is already on the path toward constructing a localized parent-child play therapy model, and it is hoped that this study will serve as a reference for future academic research and practice.