資料開放與透明的實務及挑戰：以北水局阿姆坪防淤隧道工程廉政平臺為例

Practices and Challenges of Open Data and Transparency: A Case Study of the Integrity Platform for the Amuping Sediment Prevention Tunnel Project by the Northern Region Water Resources Bureau

石門水庫「阿姆坪防淤隧道工程」為水利署北區水資源局（以下簡稱北水局）重大工程之一，廉政平臺所揭露的相關業務資料開放，也成為廉政治理中，達成透明與效率的重要工具。在開放政府的浪潮下，希望透過廉政平臺，提升公平、透明、課責的理念。藉著與政策利害關係人（主要為政府、廠商）的對話和該領域理論專家的討論，進一步瞭解實務與理論。本研究主要研究問題為：一、目前開放資料在相關人員間的執行現況為何？開放資料觀念的認知為何？二、推動開放資料的過程中，從執行面、法規面、組織面，有哪些挑戰與需要調整之處？

本研究透過北水局廉政平臺建置與資料開放的過程，和同仁及專家進行深度訪談與焦點座談，發現組織中同仁雖對於開放資料有顧慮，但管理端期待廉政平臺的資訊公開能對公務同仁帶來保護和賦權的功能。並從資料開放的執行，一開始選擇對於使用者（業務同仁、廠商）負擔較少且易於使用的資料，再逐步提升並擴大開放資料的範圍和品質。組織中，讓內部行政流程不造成同仁負擔，並提出開放資料對業務流程的保障；法規上，希望政府加速修改現有規範並與時俱進，藉廉政平臺制度化，保有內、外部的共同監督與課責機制，使廉政平臺與開放資料得以相互運用，並在廉政治理的實務中相輔相成。

The Amuping Sediment Prevention Tunnel Project at Shimen Reservoir, along with various desilting efforts, represents a major initiative under the Northern Region Water Resources Bureau (NRWRB), involving significant budgetary investments. To enhance transparency and efficiency, project data such as bidding and execution records have been disclosed via an integrity platform, serving as a cornerstone for integrity governance. In line with global trends promoting open government, this platform supports principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability. This study aims to bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical implementation through dialogues with stakeholders—primarily government personnel and contractors—as well as consultations with open data experts. The research centers on two key questions: 1. What is the current status of open data implementation among NRWRB personnel, and how well do they understand the concept? 2. What challenges and adjustments are needed in terms of execution, regulations, and organizational structure to effectively promote open data?

Using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with NRWRB staff and experts, the study examines the development and deployment of the integrity platform. Findings indicate that while some personnel express concerns, managerial-level staff view transparency as a protective and empowering mechanism for public servants. To reduce user burden during initial implementation, data selected for release prioritized ease of access and use. Over time, the scope and quality of open data are being expanded. Internally, processes are structured to integrate open data practices without overloading staff, demonstrating its potential to enhance workflow security. From a regulatory standpoint, there is a recognized need to accelerate legal and policy updates to meet evolving requirements. Overall, institutionalizing the integrity platform supports both internal and external accountability, enabling open data and integrity governance to mutually reinforce each other.