生成式AI對刑事實務之挑戰（上）

The Challenge of Generative AI for Criminal Practice

生成式AI，在刑事實體法上可能產生業務、公務機密或個人隱私的洩露、智慧財產權侵害、使用與散播虛假訊息、提升網路犯罪強度等法律風險，我國普通刑法與附屬刑法已有相應的修法。
生成式AI也廣泛運用於刑事實務上。例如，偵查中模擬犯罪現場、製毒工廠、詐欺犯罪以及組織犯罪集團，甚至攻堅的預測行為等。審判中也可用於協助裁判書類草擬，將對刑事程序法帶來新的挑戰。必須建構值得信賴的生成式AI規範，維護人民對司法的信任。長期而言，更應該制定人工智慧基本法，作為原則性規範，進一步完善我國整體的人工智慧法制。

Generative AI, in criminal substantive law, may result in the disclosure of business, official secrets or personal privacy, infringement of intellectual property rights, the use and dissemination of false information, and the enhancement of the intensity of cybercrime, and other legal risks. Accordingly, Taiwan’s criminal law and subordinate criminal laws have been amended in response.
Generative AI is now also widely used in criminal practice. For example, it can be used to simulate crime scenes, drug factories, frauds, the organization of criminal groups, and even to predict the behavior of an attacker during investigations. In trials, it can also be used to assist in the drafting of judgments, which will pose new challenges for the criminal procedure law. It is necessary to build trustworthy generative AI norms to maintain the people’s trust in the judiciary. In the long run, the Basic AI Act should be formulated as a principle to improve the framework of AI legal system in Taiwan.