英文摘要 |
This paper focuses on the two main pillars of the so-called“loot box law”: obligation of loot box probability disclosure and responsibility for false or misleading probability disclosure. By comparing and analyzing statutes, regulations, and related cases in Taiwan, Japan and Korea, it attempts to point out questions and concerns to be resolved under Taiwanese regulations. Further, it also discusses three relevant issues in the context of Taiwan: 1. the limitation of the scope of the subject matter required to be disclosed under current regulations, 2. how to improve the enforcement of administrative orders imposed on foreign game companies, and 3. whether the authority concerned should periodically verify the accuracy of the probability disclosed by game companies. |