Active pulmonary tuberculosis without isolation may increase risk of community infection. Family physicians and nurses are often put into a difficult situation when complicated patients refuse hospitalization. The article presents an 87-year-old woman with dyspnea and chest pain visiting the emergency department. Massive bloody pericardial effusion was drained by pericardial-pleural window, but dyspnea with productive cough still persisted. Three sets of acid-fast stain showed positive; tuberculosis was accordingly diagnosed. She was transferred to isolation ward and received anti-tuberculosis drugs discontinued on the 10th day of treatment due to drug-induced hepatitis. She was then discharged with improved symptoms and continuous negative findings of acid-fast stain. However, the sputum culture indicated the presence of tuberculosis after her discharge. Her family, however, refused to have her hospitalized again to restart the treatment. In the face of such a difficulty, family physicians and nurses need to make proper decisions by understanding the guidelines for treating hepatotoxicity of anti-tuberculosis drugs, as well as the competent authorities, procedures, and relevant laws and regulations of compulsory isolation. Last but not least, it is also vital to consider medical ethics and to adjust discharge planning so as to facilitate optimal management.