| 英文摘要 |
Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-affiliated Taiwan-focused think tanks have long been characterized in media and public discourse as either ''hawks'' or ''doves.'' This conventional distinction is typically grounded in regional assumptions: Beijing, as the political center under direct central authority, is presumed to adopt a more hardline stance toward Taiwan and thus labeled hawkish; Shanghai, with its concentration of Taiwanese business interests, and Fujian, given its close geographic and cultural proximity to Taiwan, are commonly regarded as more dovish. Drawing on an empirical approach to examine the discursive styles of think tanks, the study analyzes over 3,340 articles published between 2003 and 2025 in three representative Taiwan-focused academic journals based in Beijing, Shanghai, and Xiamen: Taiwan Studies, Cross-Taiwan Strait Studies, and Taiwan Research Journal. All articles are classified into seven thematic categories—politics, economy and trade, diplomacy, military, society, integration, and culture and history—to compare stylistic emphases across regions. In addition, the study incorporates in-depth interviews conducted in Beijing, Shanghai, and Xiamen with senior mainland Chinese scholars possessing extensive experience in journal editing and Taiwan-focused research. Apart from tracing long-term stylistic trends across the three journals, the analysis further compares the first ten years and the subsequent thirteen years of the study period, corresponding broadly to the Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping administrations. It also examines the relationship between the roles of think tanks and their policy stances before and after major turning points in cross-strait relations, assessing whether think tanks primarily function as agenda setters prior to policy shifts or as reactive interpreters following policy decisions. The findings indicate that Beijing-based journals are most closely synchronized with the pace and direction of CCP Taiwan policy discourse. However, Shanghai—rather than Beijing—places the greatest emphasis on political themes, while Xiamen continues to prioritize cultural and historical studies of Taiwan. A temporal comparison further reveals that during the Hu Jintao era, economic and trade-related research occupied a more prominent position, whereas under Xi Jinping, the proportion of such studies declined alongside a marked increase in diplomatic and integration-oriented research. These shifts closely correspond to changes in CCP Taiwan policy and the evolving cross-strait environment. This study develops a dual-axis analytical framework. The vertical axis, ''division-of-labor state corporatism,'' explains how Taiwan-focused think tanks and the central decision-making system interact through knowledge provision and policy formation. The horizontal axis, ''collaborative policy network,'' captures the functional differentiation, complementarity, and knowledge coordination among think tanks. Under a strong-state structure, these institutions perform distinct yet interconnected roles, collectively shaping the central government's Taiwan policy framework. 授權聲明網址:https://www.mjib.gov.tw/EditPage/?PageID=45a23953-ef7b-4a6a-a488-a3d57d9018d5 |