《石渠禮論》喪服類佚文疏證及其相關問題研究

On the Lost Texts Concerning Mourning Attire in Shiqu Li Lun and Related Issues

西漢甘露年間，宣帝詔諸儒講五經同異，史稱「石渠閣會議」，堪稱經學史上一大盛事。本文重輯《通典》所引《石渠禮論》喪服類佚文十二條，分作「通同〈喪服傳〉者」、「議〈喪服傳〉未論者」兩種類型，逐條進行疏證，以考察石渠閣會議在政治上、學術上的意義與價值。進而發現：政治方面，「開會動機」未必是學者主張的想要以《穀梁》義理取代《公羊》。此外，石渠閣會議不只是單純的學術研討，而有社會現實的需求。是以宣帝「稱制臨決」，必須為此負起學術上連同政治上的責任。學術方面，考證〈喪服傳〉與后倉一系禮學關係密切。〈喪服傳〉或是戴聖整理會議結論作為〈喪服〉教材，其後輾轉鈔錄，遠至武威。

During the Ganlu reign period of the Western Han dynasty, Emperor Xuan summoned various Confucian scholars to discuss similarities and differences in the interpretation of the Five Classics. This event, known historically as the“Shiquge Conference,”may be regarded as highly significant in the history of Confucian scholarship. This article reconstructs twelve lost texts concerning mourning attire cited in the Tongdianand classifies them into two types:“those that correspond to the Sangfuzhuan”and“those that examine issues left untreated in the Sangfuzhuan.”It then provides detailed analyses of each passage in order to examine the political and scholarly significance of the Shiquge Conference.
The study argues that, politically, the motivation for convening the conference was not necessarily, as some scholars have claimed, to replace the principles of the Gongyangzhuanwith those of the Guliangzhuan. Moreover, the Shiquge Conference was not merely an academic discussion but also addressed social realities. Therefore, Emperor Xuan's proclamation of the final decision must have carried both scholarly and political responsibilities. From an academic perspective, this study demonstrates that the Sangfuzhuanwas closely associated with the ritual studies of the Hou Cang lineage. The Sangfuzhuanmay have been compiled by Dai Sheng, who systematized certain doctrinal conclusions concerning ritual norms as instructional material on the Sangfu. It was subsequently transmitted through successive manuscript copying, eventually reaching as far as Wuwei.