| 英文摘要 |
The Tiantai doctrine of“the Ineradicable Presence of Evil within Buddha-nature”(fo buduan xing’e) originates from the Guanyin Xuanyi, which posits that both Buddhas and sentient beings inherently possess both good and evil natures. The existence of this inherent evil holds particular significance for the Buddha’s salvation of sentient beings. While this doctrine diverges from conventional Buddhist positions, the Tiantai school advances it as one of its characteristic teachings. This paper’s primary focus is to explore whether this doctrine can be authentically attributed to Zhiyi (538-597). To that end, the paper examines several key concepts, including Zhiyi and Guanding’s (561-632) definition of“evil,”the meaning of“evil”within the framework of inherent virtue (xingde), and whether related notions—including suchness nature (rushixing) and the concept of“virtue”(de)—contain or imply the presence of evil. By analyzing the relationships between these concepts and evil, this study establishes criteria for assessing whether the doctrine of“the ineradicable presence of evil within Buddha-nature”is consistent with Zhiyi’s original thought. Additionally, the paper identifies several contradictory viewpoints within the Guanyin Xuanyi itself. Based on these analyses, it concludes that neither the three major Tiantai treatises nor Guanding’s interpretations of Buddha-nature incorporate the notion of inherent evil. In other words, the doctrine of“the ineradicable presence of evil within Buddha-nature”as presented in the Guanyin Xuanyi differs in both stance and perspective from the Buddha-nature theories of Zhiyi and Guanding. The paper concludes that this doctrine does not originate from Zhiyi. |