| 英文摘要 |
Residential stability is a common expectation among most people, and it affects both physical and mental health as well as perceived well-being. Based on this concept, this study examines county and city residents’views on the lease terms of social housing in order to understand whether the current design of lease periods meets residents’needs. Taking sample heterogeneity into account, this study employs a Generalised Ordered Probit Model for analysis. The empirical results show that, with the exception of Yunlin County, across counties, cities, and various individual conditions, the probability of choosing a lease term is highest in the interval between 6 and less than 7 years. Even in Taipei City with high housing prices, or among households with monthly incomes below NT$20,000, the greatest probability still falls in the 6 to less than 7 years range. This indicates that the current design of social housing lease terms, with a principle of 3 years and may be extended up to a total of 6 years, and up to 12 years for economically disadvantaged groups and persons with disabilities, can still satisfy the housing needs of residents across counties, cities, and conditions. However, given that differences in socioeconomic environments across counties and cities have resulted in housing price-to-income ratios reaching unsustainable levels, and considering the heterogeneous needs of local residents, it is recommended that the central government deliberate on granting local governments the authority to establish their own social housing lease conditions. This could better meet the diverse needs of county and city residents and embody the spirit of local autonomy. |