| 英文摘要 |
This article evaluates Daniel Andler’s work, Intelligence artificielle, intelligence humaine: la doubleénigme, which examines the fundamental distinctions between artificial and human intelligence. By analyzing AI’s technical evolution, Andler refutes the claim that AI can replace human agency. He argues that intelligence exceeds mere problem-solving, emphasizing the role of“situations”—a domain where human agency interacts with and transforms contexts as ethnomethodology claims, unlike the“semantically blind”nature of AI. Regarding risk, the review discusses“value alignment,”highlighting how AI’s lack of common sense and increasing autonomy can lead to catastrophic outcomes that diverge from human goals. Ultimately, synthesizing various perspectives, the article warns against anthropomorphizing AI and cautions against using AI’s operational logic to“reverse-misunderstand”the true essence of human cognition. |