| 英文摘要 |
This article discusses Japan's stance on rare metal reserves in the context of geopolitical changes in East Asia, from the perspective of either the 'commercial peace' or 'trade expectations' theory. By comparing historical data from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the House of Councilors, the Ministry of the Environment, and advisory bodies and related operational units such as the Japan Organization for Metals and Energy Security (JOGMEC) and its predecessor, the Gas and Metals Resources and Minerals Organization, the article finds inconsistencies in Japanese government agencies' definitions for the types of rare metals held, leading to inaccuracies in the periodization of the evolution of rare metal reserves in some early studies. A comparison with the International Trade Centre database reveals that while Japan still relies on market mechanisms for most items, the framework of the US-China trade war has resulted in a significant ''decoupling'' of key defense and strategic industry materials from China, such as manganese and lithium. Furthermore, compared to the ambiguity of the official long-term strategy, through its analysis of resource diplomacy, this article finds that large Japanese trading companies and conglomerates sometimes play a more influential intermediary role in resource diplomacy than official institutions. |