| 英文摘要 |
The traditional interpretation of the theory of tax debt relationship centers on the de-administrativization of tax law, with the theoretical presumption that only through privatization can tax law achieve taxpayer-orientation. However, the privatization of tax law completely overlooks the unique characteristics of tax law, imposing an unbearable burden on private law, while also fundamentally misinterpreting the value and function of modern administrative law. The essence of the theory of tax debt relationship should be the contractualization of tax relations. Based on this, in the formulation of the General Provisions of Tax Law, to fulfill the role of tax law in Chinese-style modernization, the aspiration for the contractualization of tax law should be integrated into it. In terms of theoretical clarification, the concept of“tax”in the constitutional sense should differ from that in legal contexts. The“tax”in the General Provisions of Tax Law should align with the spirit of modern constitutionalism, meaning it should be reshaped from three perspectives: the balance between state power and taxpayer rights, the unity of tax collection and utilization, and the pursuit of justice. In terms of micro-construction, tax administrative enforcement should introduce flexible enforcement mechanisms to respond to the contractualization of administrative law, specifically embodied in institutional constructions such as a tax collection and payment mutual trust mechanism encompassing taxpayer interest expression, mutual trust-based rewards and penalties, and tax transparency. |