國際特赦組織台灣分會的青年發展策略實作

Amnesty International Taiwan’s Youth Development Strategic Implementation Practice

本文探討人權組織如何透過系統化的策略管理，推動組織轉型與青年賦權。以國際特赦組織台灣分會（以下簡稱台灣分會）為個案，分析其在具備穩定資源與治理體系後，如何自主發展「2026-2030青年發展策略」，並同時以此作為組織策略培力的試驗，透過試錯與迭代建立動態適應能力。
策略推動過程首先建立共享策略語言，運用SPTSi架構區分策略、治理政策與執行實務。過程中導入金字塔原理（MECE原則）建構議題樹，系統化梳理組織內外對青年定位的問題意識。此外，透過「策略鑄造」（Strategy Foundry）與利害關係人進行深度訪談與問卷調查，診斷組織結構面臨的關鍵挑戰。
本文最後反思本次策略制定對組織治理方法有三層意義：（1）方法建立的意義；（2）團隊培力的意義；（3）治理意識的意義。組織策略方法論建立的過程中，組織本身也會建立更強的治理能量。

This paper examines how human rights organizations promote organizational transformation and youth empowerment through systematic strategic management. Taking Amnesty International Taiwan as a case study, it analyzes how the Taiwan Section, building on stable resources and an established governance system, independently developed its“2026-2030 Youth Development Strategy.”At the same time, this strategy served as an experiment in organizational strategic capacity-building, through which the organization developed dynamic adaptive capabilities through trial, error, and iteration.
The strategy implementation process began with the establishment of a shared strategic language. By applying the SPTSi framework, the organization differentiated between strategy, governance policies, and implementation practices. The process also introduced the Pyramid Principle and the MECE principle to construct an issue tree, systematically mapping internal and external understandings of youth positioning within the organization. In addition, through the“Strategy Foundry”process, the organization conducted in-depth interviews and questionnaire surveys with stakeholders to diagnose key structural challenges facing the organization.
Finally, this paper reflects on the significance of this strategy formulation for organizational governance methods at three levels: (1) the establishment of methodology; (2) team capacity-building; and (3) governance awareness. In the process of developing an organizational strategic methodology, the organization itself also strengthened its governance capacity.