月旦知識庫
月旦知識庫 會員登入元照網路書店月旦品評家
 
 
  1. 熱門:
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
法制史研究:中國法制史學會會刊 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
晚明清初文書行政內廷路線考述
並列篇名
The Inner Court Routes in Document Administration during the Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasties
作者 馬子木
中文摘要
雍、乾之際,隨著軍機處成為新的權力中樞,奏摺逐漸取代題本成為君臣交流與政情上達的核心渠道。這一轉折實有長時段的脈絡可循。明崇禎年間(1628-1644),密題、密奏等密本開始流行,形成了皇帝與外廷相對直接且秘密的交流渠道。明、清易代後,清廷重新界定內廷,改造十三衙門為滿洲監臨之下的宦官機構,在順治朝(1644-1661)成為內廷政令傳遞的一環;而內大臣、侍衛等八旗侍從群體承擔溝通內外的職能,並作為皇帝的代理人參與外廷政務。康熙年間(1662-1722),得益於密摺與非密摺的有效分工,已有相當多政務的處理轉移到以奏摺為載體的新的文書行政渠道。這些變化並非線性的,從不同側面共同反映出晚明清初文書行政與政務運作的普遍趨勢,即中間機構的淡化與君臣直接交流的確立,而其實現,又有賴於一套相對獨立、且與內廷親緣更近的文書行政體系。
英文摘要
During the transition between the Yongzheng雍正(1723-1735) and Qianlong乾隆(1736-1796) reigns, as the Grand Council emerged as the new power center, palace memorials (zouzhe奏摺) gradually replaced routine memorials (tiben題本) as the primary channel for communication between the emperor and his officials, as well as for reporting political affairs. The abolition of private routine memorials (zouben奏本) and the relegation of routine memorials to routine administrative matters marked a transformative breakthrough in the political and administrative system of early Qing China. This shift was closely tied to the political landscape between the Kangxi康熙(1662-1722) and Yongzheng periods and the decisive governance style of the Yongzheng Emperor, while also following a long-term historical trajectory.
The document-based administrative system, centered on formal petitions and memorial books, had already been challenged by the early Chongzhen崇禎(1628-1644) period of the Ming dynasty at the latest. During Chongzhen’s reign, secret memorials (miti密題, mizou密奏) became popular, allowing officials to bypass the Office of Communication’s review process and avoiding the need for copies to be distributed. These secret memorials, coupled with the issuance of yuqian faxia hongben御前發下紅本, established a relatively direct and confidential communication channel between the emperor and outer court officials. The former bypassed the Censorate’s review, while the latter even circumvented the Six Ministries, a practice that continued after the Ming-Qing transition.
The composition of the inner court in the Ming and Qing dynasties differed significantly. In the early Qing period, the inner court was redefined: on one hand, the Thirteen Yamens (shisan yamen十三衙門) were restructured into eunuch institutions under Manchu supervision, with Manchu seal-holding officials collaborating with Grand Ministers (Nei dachen內大臣), forming a part of the transmission of political directives during the Shunzhi順治reign (1644-1661). On the other hand, from the Shunzhi period onward, Grand Ministers of the Imperial Household and imperial guards assumed the role of mediating between the inner and outer courts, relaying memorials and imperial edicts while also acting as the emperor’s agents in external political affairs. During the Kangxi reign, the effective division of labor between confidential and non-confidential memorials further facilitated this transformation. By then, a substantial portion of state affairs had already shifted to the new document-based administrative system centered on memorials, especially in matters related to the inner court (neige內閣), the Eight Banners (baqi八旗), and tributary states (fanshu藩屬).
These changes were not entirely linear but collectively reflected a broader trend in late Ming and early Qing administrative operations—diminishing the role of intermediary institutions and establishing more direct communication between the emperor and his officials. This transformation was ultimately made possible by the development of a relatively independent document administration system that was closely tied to the inner court.
起訖頁 5-30
關鍵詞 密本內廷侍衛奏摺晚明清初secret memorialsinner courtimperial guardspalace memorialsMing-Qing transition
刊名 法制史研究:中國法制史學會會刊  
期數 202512 (42期)
出版單位 中國法制史學會;中央研究院歷史語言研究所
該期刊-上一篇 「清代行政制度變革」專號導言──連續性、路徑依賴與制度調適
該期刊-下一篇 清代《賦役全書》的重修與刪減研究──以清代題本奏摺數據庫分析為中心
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄