| 英文摘要 |
This study explores the connection between Hubert Damisch’s use of concepts in Théorie du /Nuage/ and the issue of expression. In the context of this discussion,“issue of expression”refers to two registers: the creation of meaning through the arrangement of pigments and the articulation of thought through the organization of words and verbal expressions. The study consists of four sections. The first section examines how“expression”is discussed within the intellectual circle to which Damisch belongs. Drawing on Francastel’s and Merleau-Ponty’s respective accounts, expression can be understood as a critical source that leads to the reformulation of thoughts. Sections 2-4 respectively focus on three concepts in Théorie du /Nuage/ that involve the issue of expression:“figure,”“sign,”and“perspective.”The discussion is twofold: first, to clarify the view of expression that Damisch conveys through these three concepts; and second, to examine how his use of these concepts relates to his arguments. This study reveals that, through his quest for the configuration process of painting and its expression, Damisch establishes an ongoing process to deconstruct and reformulate concepts. The significance of such conceptual deformations lies not in providing definitions of“expression”but in demonstrating a movement that shifts in conceptual connections and reformulations of thought. Furthermore, this movement corresponds to the complex process of medium configuration. |