| 英文摘要 |
This paper is the consummation of a series of investigations into the evolution of historiography in eleventh-century China. Focusing on the compilation of the Comprehensive Mirror for Aids in Government (hereafter, CM), this paper seeks to restore it to its historiographical context prior to becoming a classic. That is, what exactly were the historiographical considerations of Sima Guang and his team, both in the forms of historical writing and in its mode of operation, particularly in comparison with several other historical texts produced around the same time? The first section analyzes the ambivalent relationship between the Guange as the site of production for the CM and as a point of departure. The paper then characterizes the compilation procedures of CM in contradistinction to the official historiographical mode of operation, with further differentiation into deformation, admission, and subscription. The final textual product of the CM can thus be seen as a historical mirror of its own, going beyond commentarial criticism and fragmentary narratives. This refreshed and contextualized understanding of the place, procedures, and product of the CM, enables us to identify specific rhetorical moments in the process. These moments and their momentum support the causal interpretation and the effect of meaning implied in the CM that we read today. |