月旦知識庫
月旦知識庫 會員登入元照網路書店月旦品評家
 
 
  1. 熱門:
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
應用倫理評論 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
從哲學人類學來看「未聞之痛」與「對話倫理」
並列篇名
From the Perspective of Philosophical Anthropology:“Unheardalgia”and“Dialogethics”
作者 孫雲平
中文摘要
本文從哲學人類學的視角出發,重新檢視Prof. G. Scarafile「未聞之痛」與「對話倫理」的討論。作者主張「未聞之痛」並非僅是生理或心理的挫折,而是一種深層的存有論危機。首先,論文透過胡賽爾與馬丁·布伯的理論,將人定義為「具身的意識性存在」。當一個人的言說被視若罔聞時,他不僅是溝通受阻,而是其作為「人」的地位被降格為物理意義上的「事物」,導致其存在世界的崩塌。其次,論文援引雅斯培與存在主義觀點,討論人作為「自由的存在」在面對痛苦時的抉擇。遭受「未聞之痛」者可能選擇成為逃避真實對話的「築防之人」,或選擇直面痛苦的「耐苦之人」。作者強調人具備自主選擇能力,即便在痛苦中亦能透過自由意志維持本真的關係。最後,論文結合韋伊與謝勒的觀點,指出人是「精神性的存在」。人類具備超越生物本能的「精神」,能在刺激與反應之間建立「緩衝區」,從而對世界保持開放。總結而言,唯有釐清人作為具身意識、自由且具精神性的本質特徵,
英文摘要
From the perspective of philosophical anthropology, this paper reexamines Prof. G. Scarafile’s discussions on‘unheard pain’and‘dialogical ethics.’The author argues that Unheardalgia is not merely a psychological or physical sensation but an ontological crisis that strikes at the core of human existence. The analysis is structured into three dimensions of human nature. First, man is viewed as“Embodied Consciousness”. Drawing on Husserl’s distinction between Leib (living body) and Körper (physical body) and Buber’s“I-Thou”relationship, the paper posits that failing to acknowledge another’s speech treats the person as a mere object, leading to a denial of their intersubjective reality. Second, the paper discusses man as a“Free Being”. Using Karl Jaspers’philosophy, it identifies two responses to suffering: Homo muniens (the defensive man) and Homo patiens (the suffering man). Unlike Freudian determinism, the author emphasizes human agency, suggesting that individuals can freely choose to face their pain authentically rather than retreating into isolation. Finally, man is characterized as a“Spiritual Being”. Influenced by Simone Weil and Max Scheler, the paper argues that“Spirit”(Geist) allows humans to transcend biological instincts. This spiritual capacity creates a“buffer zone”between stimulus and response, enabling humans to remain open to the“world”(Welt) rather than being confined to a biological“environment”. The paper concludes that recognizing these essential human traits—embodiment, freedom, and spirituality—is the prerequisite for achieving meaningful dialogue and overcoming the isolation caused by Unheardalgia.
起訖頁 65-77
關鍵詞 哲學人類學未聞之痛具身意識自由的存在精神性的存在Philosophical AnthropologyUnheardalgiaEmbodied ConsciousnessFree BeingSpiritual Being
刊名 應用倫理評論  
期數 202604 (80期)
出版單位 國立中央大學哲學研究所應用倫理研究中心
該期刊-上一篇 The Listening Put to the Test: Introductory Note to the Replies
該期刊-下一篇 Reply to Prof. Yun-Ping Sun’s Observations
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄