| 英文摘要 |
This study aimed to examine relevant regulations and international standards for whole-body and hand-arm vibration exposure in various countries (including the United States, Europe, and Japan) and to compare these with current occupational safety and health laws and regulations in Taiwan regarding health hazard assessment and permissible exposure duration. The results indicate that Taiwan's current regulations (Regulations for the Occupational Safety and Health Equipments and Measures Clause 301 and 302) are derived from international standards prior to 1990. These regulations, in addition to being subject to certain limitations in their application, also differ significantly from current regulations in Europe and the United States. This may impact the implementation and enforcement of whole-body and hand-arm vibration hazard management in Taiwan. Therefore, it is necessary to consider international trends and revise relevant regulations to align with current international standards. Regarding the revision of relevant laws and regulations in Taiwan, it is recommended that reference be made to the provisions of EU Directive 2002/44/EC on vibration exposure, and reference be made to relevant laws and regulations based on current international trends. This should make it easier to detect operations with vibration hazard exposure and to calculate their permissible exposure time, thereby complying with international trends in vibration exposure hazard prevention and management, and protecting worker safety and health. |