| 英文摘要 |
This paper presents an exploratory study based on the compilation and analysis of data concerning the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the domestic labor market. The research findings and conclusions indicate that all industries have varying degrees of demand for the adoption of AI technologies. Based on interview analyses conducted in the financial services industry and the human health and social work services sector, AI is generally perceived as being primarily applied to repetitive tasks and tasks with a certain level of complexity. Respondents remain cautious regarding AI’s potential to create entirely new job positions. Moreover, the introduction of AI has not resulted in significant job displacement. Instead, through complementary effects, it has increased demand for AI-related professional talent, thereby creating employment opportunities. On the contrary, it has led to clearer delineation of job content and further optimization of the division of labor within industries. Short-term recommendations include: 1. Strengthening vocational training mechanisms to respond to and meet cross-disciplinary workforce demands; 2. Implementing enterprise-level AI adoption support programs, with job restructuring assistance tailored to different age groups, genders, and industries; 3. Expanding capacity for AI automation training through enhanced union participation and skills development mechanisms; 4. Establishing guidance mechanisms for AI automation adoption, while assisting middle-aged and older workers in adapting to and learning AI technologies; and 5. Developing and promoting successful AI adoption business models categorized by enterprise size. Longterm recommendations include: 1. Establishing an AI automation talent database to address digital transformation and cross-disciplinary talent needs; 2. Building a comprehensive AI education system that ensures a“human-centered”development framework, with AI ethics integrated across all educational stages from primary to higher education; and 3. Driving industrial innovation and strengthening international market linkages to expand the AI industrial ecosystem. In the future, more detailed investigations into industrial divisions of labor and classification may be conducted to dynamically revise and refine assessments of AI’s benefits and supportive roles for Taiwan’s industries. |