| 英文摘要 |
Yu Qiuyu's prose naration has given rise to a wave of cultural writings. His prose revealed the idea that both history and life are the result of ''bifold structure of firing crockery'' (兩重窯變觀). Yu is good at creating his personal and marketing legends by combining rarely-known historical materials and theories with the techniques of drama and mass media. As a whole, this results from his familiar techniques of naration marketing and performance vending. In terms of reader response, Yu focuses on the idea of “invocation structure” in his works, and this focus matches the awkening and touching of this visionary, legendary and aesthetic economy era. However, during the decade of the movement from “Yu Qiuyu Fervor” to “Yu Qiuyu Phenomenon”, Yu has received criticisms while the mass media reported his works, critics commented on his stance during the Cultural Revolution, and his works are found to be defective with mistakes of common sense and historical facts. Facing these criticisms, Yu were not willing to take them and even attempted to fightback. In my opinion the archetype of Yu's literary psychology is related to East-Chekiang (浙東) tradition represented by Huang Zuengxi (黃宗羲) as well as the modern Shanghai citizen personality. This procedure is the formation of the entire personality, and underlying psyche mechanism and narrative model are involved. In his cultural prose narration, as well as in the fundamental literary argument ''how to construct an intact cultural personality'', Yu asserts the process from the surface layer of drama plot aura to the deeper layer of exploring collective cultural personality, in the effort to prove his understanding on cultural anthropology in terms of unconsciousness. In terms of Yu himself and hiw works, the dialectic of “self” and “other” provides a full-scale arena of discussion in the cultural discussion. This project is to give more thoughts on ''Yu Qiuyu Phenomenon'' by focusing on how Yu's “cultural prose” naration becomes the typical case of naration marketing by combing prose, novel, drama, biography and common science. The new style of “memory literature” is addressed while the literary circle is discussing his works. In terms of industry, cultural heritage is transformed to be cultural asset, to keep Yu's personal myth going on. This manifests the contemporary “cultural IQ” and “cultural industry” trend, and this will be a good reference to today's studies of Yu Qiuyu Phenomenon. |