| 英文摘要 |
This paper reconsiders the evolution from Miyazawa Kenji's colloquial poem ''Wild Horse'' to the classical-diction poem ''Wild Horse [II]'' not as a mere refinement of style, but as the inevitable outcome of an ethical shift in the poet's stance—from observation to response. Through an analysis of drafts, the study traces this dynamic trajectory and shows that the critical utterance voiced by the character Hōsuke—an instance of the ''voice of the Other''—served as a decisive intervention that dismantled the poet's privileged position as observer. The ultimate choice of a condensed fixed-form poem in classical diction did not seek to resolve the ethical impasse by explanatory means. Rather, it enacts a new poetics that responds to the impasse by submerging it, as a symbol, within the community's mythic spatiotemporal field. |