| 英文摘要 |
Decision-making in foreign policy crises often has long-term and far-reaching consequences, making the quality of decisions critically important. Leaders demonstrate varying levels of performance under crisis conditions—some respond decisively and appropriately, while others hesitate or lack sound judgment. These differences can be attributed to the varying degrees of psychological stress experienced. Stress consists of three key elements: stimuli, cognitive processing, and response. In foreign policy crises, the perceived threat to national objectives serves as the primary stressor. Once this threat is internalized and accompanied by negative emotions, coping behaviors are activated, potentially impairing a leader’s ability to make timely and effective decisions. This study employs American political psychologist Margaret G. Hermann’s three stress indicators to analyze the verbal and non-verbal behaviors of Russian President Vladimir Putin. It aims to identify patterns of stress, emotional expressions, and coping strategies in the context of the ongoing Russia–Ukraine war. As the war continues to escalate—with significant resource consumption and uncertain outcomes—Putin’s true intentions remain unclear, and the end of the conflict unpredictable. By introducing a political psychology perspective, this paper offers an alternative to traditional international relations approaches and contributes to a more nuanced understanding of decision-making under pressure in wartime leadership. |