| 英文摘要 |
Due to the flourishing of Tibetan Buddhism in the Mongolian regions, the Manchus began receiving information about Tibet via Mongolia by the early seventeenth century, which fostered their growing interest in the Himalayan region. A universalist discourse within Tibetan Buddhism shaped the Manchus’initial conception of Tibet as a sacred geography akin to Bodhgaya, and they drew on Tibetan Buddhist cultural symbols—including the Sakya Lekshé(Sa skya legs bshad) and the golden Mahākāla statue inherited from the Mongol Yuan dynasty—as sources of legitimacy in founding the Qing dynasty. Beginning in the Chongde era (1636–1644), the Qing court gradually developed its knowledge of Tibet through epistolary and material exchanges. However, as bilateral interactions deepened, the limitations of the Qing’s intelligence-gathering capacity became increasingly apparent. These shortcomings culminated in a series of diplomatic disputes during the reign of the Shunzhi Emperor (r. 1643–1661), when the Tibetan government dispatched tribute envoys to China proper in the name of the Phagmodrupa ruler, referred to in Chinese sources as the“Chanhua wang”闡化王. The unauthorized tribute missions prompted the Qing court to dispatch officials to conduct on-site investigations in Tibet, a move which ultimately reshaped the Qing’s understanding of the region and had far-reaching implications for Qing-Tibetan relations from the late seventeenth century onward. |