| 英文摘要 |
Totalitarianism was once an important ''ideological'' analysis tool in comparative politics and China studies. In recent years, academic researchers have mostly analyzed the forms of governance in mainland China from the perspectives of post-totalitarianism, authoritarian toughness, or rigid authoritarianism. There are also people who analyze why the“reform and opening”policy had achieved achievements quickly and successful, in order to the perspective of meritocracy and good governance. Fukuyama explained the key reasons for the successful development of the mainland from the perspective of a strong government. Some commentators have recently pointed out that totalitarianism has returned, and they call it the ''new totalitarianism.'' This article will explore the basic characteristics and realistic references of totalitarianism, and explore whether totalitarianism is a reality within reach, or is it limited to ''ideological'' analytical concepts? This article further points out that we should look for advantages and opportunities to maintain the hegemony of the United States from the perspective of American interests. Or should we start from the perspective of ''introspecting the West,'' caring about China's own adjustment and development, and then comparing different transitional experiences between countries, exploring the difficulties faced by the ''post-totalitarian system,'' in order to grasp the causes of institutional changes and promoting good governance? |