| 英文摘要 |
Do minority bureaucrats provide active representation? The study addresses this question by examining the link between negative and positive representation of race in National Immigration Agency and instances of racial profiling. Literature from two areas—racial profiling and representative bureaucracy—is brought together. Through in-depth interview and paired-comparison method, it was found that new immigrant immigration officers show a higher degree of positive representation than native immigration officers, both in attitude and behavior. Racial profiling is common among native immigration officers:In addition to linking Southeast Asians with concepts such as low-level laborers and illegal crimes, foreigners from Southeast Asia are much more likely to be suspected than those from Europe and North America by native immigration officers. They are less respectful, polite and friendly toward Southeast Asians, and more easily to use coercive, restrictive and less favorable measures against them. On the contrary, new immigrant immigration officers are less hostile against Southeast Asians and more empathy toward them. They also reduce discriminations of racial profiling against Southeast Asians in the process of law enforcement or discretion, and are more friendly, responsible and willing to advocate for interests of Southeast Asians. The findings confirm that the most important demographic variable (race) in representative bureaucracy theory are applicable in Taiwan, and also make a step forward for Taiwan’s representative bureaucracy research. |