電信詐欺著手實行之評價方法——日本最高裁判所平成30年3月22日判決解說與借鏡

A Criterion of Commencing Telecommunications Fraud: The analysis of the Judgement of the Supreme Court of Japan on 22nd March 2018

關於未遂犯之著手時點，我國實務一向認為必須達到法益侵害直接危險或該當構成要件行為密切關係（隨時實現），學說即使是印象理論也要求補強判斷標準。然而，我國實務卻一向認為電信詐欺成員撥打電話之行為即屬著手，惟此種行為是否造成財產法益之直接危險或可以隨時實現詐欺罪？恐有疑問。對此，本文介紹日本最高裁判所平成30年3月22日判決，藉由比較法觀點考察我國實務見解之妥當性。

In the regard of the initiation of a crime conduct, the practice in Taiwan has been considering it as either an immediate offense to the infringement on legal interests or a fulfillment of the legal elements to a certain crime. That is, the crime is conducting. Meanwhile, the theory of impressionism (Eindruckstheorie) requires a supplementary criterion as well. However, the initiation of a call is judged as the conduct of such crime in Taiwan. The concern is about the connection between such behavior and the infringement on legal interests. As such, this article aims to examine the appropriateness of these judgements within the scope of comparative jurisprudence, aligned with the Judgement of the Supreme Court of Japan on 22nd March 2018.