| 英文摘要 |
Introducing human rights due diligence (HRDD) as the investors' obligation in international investment law can help to safeguard the proper exercise of regulatory powers by host States and mitigate human rights risks. While many states have incorporated or updated related HRDD provisions in their model bilateral investment treaties, the provisions of international investment agreements (IIAs) in force that address this obligation are generally not binding. Indeed, by analyzing past awards in international investment arbitrations involving investor due diligence, HRDD obligation can motivate investors to protect human rights in the host State through at least four paths: by affecting the jurisdiction of the tribunal, the admissibility of the claim, the allocation of liability, and by giving rise to counterclaims by the host State. However, the realization of these functions is highly uncertain due to the practical factors such as ambiguous standards and inadequacy of specific provisions. Therefore, based on domestic laws and relevant international norms, a relatively uniform standard of investors'HRDD should be constructed. And it is also important to clarify the legal attributes of this obligation and to improve the specific provisions in IIAs in accordance with the path of its functioning. For China, as a major two-way country in terms of outward investment and the use of foreign direct investment, it is necessary to include the corporate social responsibility clauses in the negotiations of the bilateral investment treaties so as to promote coherence between human rights and development in international investment. |