| 英文摘要 |
Catch-all provisions typically address the residual, minor matters not covered by the main provisions of a legal text, using propositional statements containing the word“other”to form an overarching clause at the hierarchical“item”level of the legal document. Observing existing catch-all provisions in current laws based on the standard of good legislation reveals several shortcomings: mismatch between scope and depth, unclear external markers, insufficient levels of enumeration, and confusion between primary and secondary status. Catch-all provisions represent a complex legal phenomenon; they are not binary choices but rather require legal wisdom to strike a balance among diverse and even contradictory legal values. They have specific normative structures, functional positions, and corresponding technical specifications. The design of catch - all provisions should be incorporated into legislative technical standards, using an appropriately dense“filter”chosen. At the same time, we should proceed thorough legislative reasoning and adopt dynamic adjustments in line with contemporary developments. |